OPPO Reno16 F vs Redmi Turbo 5 Max
The OPPO Reno16 F (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; launch prices were $480 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads — 71/100 vs 63/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 Max has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 7000); the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is faster in AnTuTu (2,726,802 vs 879,714); the OPPO Reno16 F is noticeably lighter (194g vs 219g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 F
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
What makes OPPO Reno16 F better?
- Lighter: 194g vs 219g
- Better camera (64/100 vs 37/100)
- Better portability (58/100 vs 45/100)
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 Max better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2726802 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 2725 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 7000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $480
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 55/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 F vs the Redmi Turbo 5 Max, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max scores 8 points higher (71/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 F leads (64/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads (80/100 vs 68/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 F — 48/100, Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 F (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the OPPO Reno16 F are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 F notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (64/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 F is a bit better (58/100 vs 45/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 F | Redmi Turbo 5 Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 2726802 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 2725 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 8932 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 9000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.5×8.4 mm | 163.0×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | $480 | $300 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 F
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 F
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 F
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Turbo 5 Max
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 F and Redmi Turbo 5 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads OPPO Reno16 F by 67.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $180. Redmi Turbo 5 Max was $180 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno16 F (89/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max and the OPPO Reno16 F are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 F notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 Max (64/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a bit better (80/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 F is a bit better (58/100 vs 45/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 F or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max edges out the OPPO Reno16 F by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 F and the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The OPPO Reno16 F has a MobileRank rating of 63/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 Max — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 F or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The OPPO Reno16 F leads on camera score (64/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 F or the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max leads on performance (89/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 F over the Redmi Turbo 5 Max?
The Redmi Turbo 5 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.