OPPO Reno16 (China) vs Redmi K80 Pro

The OPPO Reno16 (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Super, while the Redmi K80 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $515 and $511. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K80 Pro leads — 81/100 vs 79/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 (China) has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Redmi K80 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,068,164 vs 2,120,347); the OPPO Reno16 (China) is noticeably lighter (188g vs 215g).

The Redmi K80 Pro edges out the OPPO Reno16 (China) by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

OPPO Reno16 (China)

Performance 77
Display 85
Camera 94
Battery 66
Portability 64
Value for money 78

Redmi K80 Pro

Performance 91
Display 90
Camera 67
Battery 87
Portability 45
Value for money 82

What makes OPPO Reno16 (China) better?

  • Bigger battery: 6700 vs 6000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 188g vs 215g

  • Better camera (94/100 vs 67/100)
  • Better portability (64/100 vs 45/100)

What makes Redmi K80 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3068164 vs 2120347
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1555
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6405
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
  • Cheaper at launch: $511 vs $515

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 77/100)
  • Longer battery life (87/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better display (90/100 vs 85/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno16 (China) vs the Redmi K80 Pro, the Redmi K80 Pro scores 2 points higher (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (91/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 (China) leads (94/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro leads (87/100 vs 66/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 (China) — 78/100, Redmi K80 Pro — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 (China) notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (94/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (China) (87/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 (China) notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (64/100 vs 45/100).

OPPO Reno16 (China): The OPPO Reno16 (China) is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.
Redmi K80 Pro: The Redmi K80 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification OPPO Reno16 (China) Redmi K80 Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Super Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2120347 3068164
Geekbench Single 1555 3013
Geekbench Multi 6405 9287
Display 6.3" AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2640x1216 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6700 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 80W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 32 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits 3200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm
Weight 188 g 215 g
Launch price $515 $511

Camera comparison

OPPO Reno16 (China)

  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

Redmi K80 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 32MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
67
camera

Display comparison

OPPO Reno16 (China)

  • 6.3" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2640x1216
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Redmi K80 Pro

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display

Battery and charging

OPPO Reno16 (China)

  • 6700 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
66
battery

Redmi K80 Pro

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
87
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno16 (China) and Redmi K80 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno16 (China) MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Super
79/100
2120347 AnTuTu
Redmi K80 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
81/100 +30.9%
3068164 AnTuTu

Redmi K80 Pro leads OPPO Reno16 (China) by 30.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OPPO Reno16 (China)

$515

Redmi K80 Pro

$511

Launch price difference: $4. Redmi K80 Pro was $4 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi K80 Pro is a bit better (91/100 vs 77/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi K80 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 (China) notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (94/100 vs 67/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi K80 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 (China) (87/100 vs 66/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 (China) notably outperforms the Redmi K80 Pro (64/100 vs 45/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 (China) or the Redmi K80 Pro?

The Redmi K80 Pro edges out the OPPO Reno16 (China) by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 (China) and the Redmi K80 Pro?

The OPPO Reno16 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Redmi K80 Pro — 81/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 (China) or the Redmi K80 Pro?

The OPPO Reno16 (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 67/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 (China) or the Redmi K80 Pro?

The Redmi K80 Pro leads on performance (91/100 vs 77/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 (China) over the Redmi K80 Pro?

The OPPO Reno16 (China) is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Redmi K80 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.