OPPO Reno15 FS vs Vivo Y32t
The OPPO Reno15 FS (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno15 FS leads — 39/100 vs 11/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno15 FS has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the OPPO Reno15 FS has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
OPPO Reno15 FS
Vivo Y32t
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (41/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (83/100 vs 55/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 189g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 63/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno15 FS vs the Vivo Y32t, the OPPO Reno15 FS scores 28 points higher (39/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno15 FS leads (41/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno15 FS leads (63/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno15 FS leads (83/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno15 FS significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno15 FS significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (41/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno15 FS notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (63/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 63/100). In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno15 FS notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (83/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno15 FS | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 736675 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 935 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2719 | — | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.9×8.2 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $385 | — |
OPPO Reno15 FS
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
OPPO Reno15 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
OPPO Reno15 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno15 FS significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno15 FS significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (41/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno15 FS notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (63/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 63/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the OPPO Reno15 FS notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (83/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno15 FS or the Vivo Y32t?
The OPPO Reno15 FS significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 28 points (39/100 vs 11/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno15 FS and the Vivo Y32t?
The OPPO Reno15 FS has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno15 FS or the Vivo Y32t?
The OPPO Reno15 FS leads on camera score (41/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno15 FS over the Vivo Y32t?
The OPPO Reno15 FS is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.