Oppo Reno13 F 4G vs Tecno Spark 40 Pro
The Oppo Reno13 F 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100, while the Tecno Spark 40 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G leads — 51/100 vs 46/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno13 F 4G has the bigger battery (5800 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Tecno Spark 40 Pro is thinner (6.7mm vs 7.8mm).
Oppo Reno13 F 4G
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
- Bigger battery: 5800 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Lighter: 192g vs 195g
- Better camera (40/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (55/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (76/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno13 F 4G vs the Tecno Spark 40 Pro, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G scores 5 points higher (51/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G leads (40/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 44/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G is a bit better (40/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G is a bit better (55/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro is a bit better (76/100 vs 66/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno13 F 4G | Tecno Spark 40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G100 | MediaTek Helio G100 | |
| AnTuTu | 576015 | 576015 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 727 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2014 | 2014 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1224x2720 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 15, HIOS 15.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2100 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 162.2×75.1×7.8 mm | 163.7×75.9×6.7 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 195 g | |
| Price | — | $150 |
Oppo Reno13 F 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
- Main: 48MP
- Front: 8MP
Oppo Reno13 F 4G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno13 F 4G
- 5800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Spark 40 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo Reno13 F 4G and Tecno Spark 40 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Oppo Reno13 F 4G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 44/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G is a bit better (40/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno13 F 4G is a bit better (55/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro is a bit better (76/100 vs 66/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno13 F 4G or the Tecno Spark 40 Pro?
The Oppo Reno13 F 4G edges out the Tecno Spark 40 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno13 F 4G and the Tecno Spark 40 Pro?
The Oppo Reno13 F 4G has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro — 46/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno13 F 4G or the Tecno Spark 40 Pro?
The Oppo Reno13 F 4G leads on camera score (40/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno13 F 4G over the Tecno Spark 40 Pro?
The Oppo Reno13 F 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Spark 40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.