Oppo Reno12 F 4G vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Oppo Reno12 F 4G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 46/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 476,175); the Vivo iQOO 16 has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo Reno12 F 4G doesn't; the Oppo Reno12 F 4G is noticeably lighter (187g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno12 F 4G
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Oppo Reno12 F 4G better?
- Lighter: 187g vs 223g
- Better portability (70/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 476175
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 466
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 1396
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 34/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 F 4G vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 43 points higher (89/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 F 4G (100/100 vs 34/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 F 4G (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 F 4G (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 F 4G (90/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 F 4G notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (70/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 F 4G | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 476175 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 466 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1396 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2100 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×75.8×7.7 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno12 F 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno12 F 4G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno12 F 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo Reno12 F 4G and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Oppo Reno12 F 4G by 91.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo Reno12 F 4G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 F 4G (100/100 vs 34/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 F 4G (99/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 F 4G (78/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 F 4G (90/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 F 4G notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (70/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 F 4G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno12 F 4G by 43 points (89/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 F 4G and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Oppo Reno12 F 4G has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno12 F 4G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno12 F 4G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 34/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 F 4G over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.