Oppo Reno12 (China) vs Xiaomi Black Shark GS3
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 (China) (2024) and the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno12 (China) leads — 41/100 vs 5/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno12 (China) has NFC for contactless payments, the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 doesn't.
Oppo Reno12 (China)
Xiaomi Black Shark GS3
- Better camera (62/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 50/100)
- Overall rating 5/100
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 (China) vs the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3, the Oppo Reno12 (China) scores 36 points higher (41/100 vs 5/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) leads (62/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) leads (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 (62/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 (76/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 (China) | Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8250 | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 1.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 466x466 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | — | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | — | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | — | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | — | |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.8×7.3 mm | — | |
| Weight | 179 g | — | |
| Price | — | — |
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Xiaomi Black Shark GS3
- Main: —
- Front: —
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi Black Shark GS3
- 1.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 466x466
- Refresh rate: —
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi Black Shark GS3
- —
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 (62/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 (51/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 (76/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 by 36 points (41/100 vs 5/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 (China) and the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 41/100, the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 — 5/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno12 (China) or the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) leads on camera score (62/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 (China) over the Xiaomi Black Shark GS3?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The Xiaomi Black Shark GS3 is a better fit for everyday use.