Oppo Reno10 vs Realme Narzo 60 Pro
The Oppo Reno10 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7050, while the Realme Narzo 60 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7050. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno10 leads — 59/100 vs 54/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 64 MP vs 100 MP; the Oppo Reno10 has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme Narzo 60 Pro doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno10
Realme Narzo 60 Pro
What makes Oppo Reno10 better?
- Better camera (61/100 vs 41/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 66/100)
What makes Realme Narzo 60 Pro better?
- Better main camera: 100MP vs 64MP
- Overall rating 54/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo Reno10 vs the Realme Narzo 60 Pro, the Oppo Reno10 scores 5 points higher (59/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno10 leads (61/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 53/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100. In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno10 notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 60 Pro (61/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 53/100. In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno10 and the Realme Narzo 60 Pro are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno10 | Realme Narzo 60 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | |
| AnTuTu | 806012 | 806012 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2398 | 2398 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2412 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 67W | 67W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 100 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 32 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 950 nits | 950 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×74.2×8.0 mm | 161.6×73.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 185 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno10
- Main: 64MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 32MP
- Front: 32MP
Realme Narzo 60 Pro
- Main: 100MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno10
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme Narzo 60 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno10
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Realme Narzo 60 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo Reno10 and Realme Narzo 60 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 53/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno10 notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 60 Pro (61/100 vs 41/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 53/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno10 and the Realme Narzo 60 Pro are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno10 or the Realme Narzo 60 Pro?
The Oppo Reno10 edges out the Realme Narzo 60 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno10 and the Realme Narzo 60 Pro?
The Oppo Reno10 has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Realme Narzo 60 Pro — 54/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno10 or the Realme Narzo 60 Pro?
The Oppo Reno10 leads on camera score (61/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno10 over the Realme Narzo 60 Pro?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Oppo Reno10 (61/100 vs 41/100).