OPPO Reno 16C vs Oppo Reno16 FS
The OPPO Reno 16C (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the Oppo Reno16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16C leads — 65/100 vs 61/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16C has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500).
OPPO Reno 16C
Oppo Reno16 FS
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 58/100)
- Lighter: 194g vs 195g
- Better portability (58/100 vs 57/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16C vs the Oppo Reno16 FS, the OPPO Reno 16C scores 4 points higher (65/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16C leads (80/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 64/100. In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16C notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS (80/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno16 FS and the OPPO Reno 16C are nearly equal (58/100 vs 57/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16C | Oppo Reno16 FS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 1080x2372 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 1400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | $499 | — |
OPPO Reno 16C
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Oppo Reno16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
OPPO Reno 16C
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16C
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless charging: no data
Oppo Reno16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared OPPO Reno 16C and Oppo Reno16 FS, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Oppo Reno16 FS
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 64/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16C notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS (80/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno16 FS and the OPPO Reno 16C are nearly equal (58/100 vs 57/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16C or the Oppo Reno16 FS?
The OPPO Reno 16C edges out the Oppo Reno16 FS by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16C and the Oppo Reno16 FS?
The OPPO Reno 16C has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Oppo Reno16 FS — 61/100.
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16C over the Oppo Reno16 FS?
The OPPO Reno 16C is a better fit for those who care about battery life. The Oppo Reno16 FS is a better fit for everyday use.