OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs ZTE Blade V50
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) and the ZTE Blade V50 (2023) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 49/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
ZTE Blade V50
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (94/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (72/100 vs 54/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the ZTE Blade V50, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 37 points higher (86/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 (94/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 (83/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade V50 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (72/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | ZTE Blade V50 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | — | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 33W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 161.9×72.8×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 178 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | — |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Blade V50
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade V50
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
ZTE Blade V50
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V50
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 (94/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 (83/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade V50 notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (72/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the ZTE Blade V50?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V50 by 37 points (86/100 vs 49/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the ZTE Blade V50?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the ZTE Blade V50 — 49/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the ZTE Blade V50?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the ZTE Blade V50?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade V50 is a better fit for everyday use.