OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Poco C40
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Poco C40 (2022) runs on the JLQ. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 31/100 (a 55-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 13 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is thinner (8.2mm vs 9.2mm).
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Poco C40
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (94/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 44/100)
- Overall rating 31/100
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Poco C40, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 55 points higher (86/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (83/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Poco C40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | JLQ | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 720x1650 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 18W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB / 64GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 169.6×76.6×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | — |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Poco C40
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C40
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Poco C40
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Poco C40
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (84/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (94/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (83/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Poco C40?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 by 55 points (86/100 vs 31/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Poco C40?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Poco C40 — 31/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Poco C40?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Poco C40?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Poco C40 is a better fit for everyday use.