OPPO Reno 16 FS vs OPPO Reno 16 Pro
The OPPO Reno 16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s; launch prices were $549 and $661. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 61/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 877,641).
OPPO Reno 16 FS
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Cheaper at launch: $549 vs $661
- Better portability (58/100 vs 54/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 FS vs the OPPO Reno 16 Pro, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 25 points higher (86/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 58/100). Value score: OPPO Reno 16 FS — 42/100, OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 84/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 FS are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (94/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (58/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 FS | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 3079298 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 2680 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 8358 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 2772x1272 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | — | |
| Launch price | $549 | $661 |
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared OPPO Reno 16 FS and OPPO Reno 16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads OPPO Reno 16 FS by 71.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $112. OPPO Reno 16 FS was $112 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (89/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 FS are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (94/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS (83/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (58/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 FS or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 FS by 25 points (86/100 vs 61/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 FS and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 FS or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 FS or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 FS over the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 FS is a better fit for everyday use. The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.