Oppo Reno 10x zoom vs Redmi K20 Pro
The Oppo Reno 10x zoom (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, while the Redmi K20 Pro (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno 10x zoom leads — 48/100 vs 46/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno 10x zoom has the bigger battery (4065 mAh vs 4000); the Redmi K20 Pro is noticeably lighter (191g vs 210g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno 10x zoom
Redmi K20 Pro
What makes Oppo Reno 10x zoom better?
- Bigger battery: 4065 vs 4000 mAh
- Better display (80/100 vs 56/100)
What makes Redmi K20 Pro better?
- Faster charging: 27W vs 20W
- Lighter: 191g vs 210g
- Better camera (41/100 vs 40/100)
- Better portability (56/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo Reno 10x zoom vs the Redmi K20 Pro, the Oppo Reno 10x zoom scores 2 points higher (48/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno 10x zoom notably outperforms the Redmi K20 Pro (80/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K20 Pro and the Oppo Reno 10x zoom are nearly equal (41/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100. In the "portability" category, the Redmi K20 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno 10x zoom (56/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno 10x zoom | Redmi K20 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | |
| AnTuTu | 824513 | 824513 | |
| Geekbench Single | 968 | 968 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2731 | 2731 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 2340x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 4065 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 27W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie); ColorOS 6 | Android 9 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 162.0×77.2×9.3 mm | 156.7×74.3×8.8 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 191 g | |
| Launch price | — | $350 |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno 10x zoom
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 13MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi K20 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno 10x zoom
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: —
Redmi K20 Pro
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno 10x zoom
- 4065 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Redmi K20 Pro
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo Reno 10x zoom and Redmi K20 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo Reno 10x zoom
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno 10x zoom notably outperforms the Redmi K20 Pro (80/100 vs 56/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K20 Pro and the Oppo Reno 10x zoom are nearly equal (41/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Redmi K20 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno 10x zoom (56/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno 10x zoom or the Redmi K20 Pro?
The Oppo Reno 10x zoom edges out the Redmi K20 Pro by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno 10x zoom and the Redmi K20 Pro?
The Oppo Reno 10x zoom has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Redmi K20 Pro — 46/100.
Should you choose the Oppo Reno 10x zoom over the Redmi K20 Pro?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Oppo Reno 10x zoom (80/100 vs 56/100).