Oppo K14 Turbo Pro vs Poco F7
The Oppo K14 Turbo Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Poco F7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro leads — 71/100 vs 66/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 6500); the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,037,573 vs 2,205,378).
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
Poco F7
- Higher AnTuTu: 3037573 vs 2205378
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 2070
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 6694
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 213g vs 215g
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (75/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 83/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (48/100 vs 46/100)
Comparing the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro vs the Poco F7, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro scores 5 points higher (71/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 and the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a bit better (75/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 and the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro are nearly equal (48/100 vs 46/100).
| Specification | Oppo K14 Turbo Pro | Poco F7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 3037573 | 2205378 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 2070 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 6694 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2800 | 2712x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 8.3×None×None mm | 163.1×77.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 213 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | — | $399 |
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco F7
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2800
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Poco F7
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Poco F7
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo K14 Turbo Pro and Poco F7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro leads Poco F7 by 37.7% in our overall performance rating.
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 and the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a bit better (75/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 and the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro are nearly equal (48/100 vs 46/100).
Which is better: the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro or the Poco F7?
The Oppo K14 Turbo Pro edges out the Poco F7 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro and the Poco F7?
The Oppo K14 Turbo Pro has a MobileRank rating of 71/100, the Poco F7 — 66/100.
Which is more powerful: the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro or the Poco F7?
The Oppo K14 Turbo Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro over the Poco F7?
The Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.