Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
The Oppo K13 Turbo Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro leads — 69/100 vs 66/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is faster in AnTuTu (2,320,720 vs 2,277,195).
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
- Better portability (62/100 vs 54/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2320720 vs 2277195
- Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 206g vs 208g
- Higher performance (82/100 vs 81/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (76/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
Comparing the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro scores 3 points higher (69/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro and the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro and the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro are nearly equal (35/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is a bit better (76/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro is a bit better (62/100 vs 54/100).
| Specification | Oppo K13 Turbo Pro | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 2277195 | 2320720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2070 | 2070 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6694 | 6694 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2800 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1600 nits | 4400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×77.2×7.3 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 208 g | 206 g | |
| Price | — | $350 |
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo K13 Turbo Pro and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro leads Oppo K13 Turbo Pro by 1.9% in our overall performance rating.
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro and the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro and the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro are nearly equal (35/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is a bit better (76/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro is a bit better (62/100 vs 54/100).
Which is better: the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro edges out the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro?
The Oppo K13 Turbo Pro has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro — 69/100.
Should you choose the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro?
The Oppo K13 Turbo Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.