Oppo K10 5G (China) vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Oppo K10 5G (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8000 Max, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 51/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Oppo K10 5G (China) is noticeably lighter (205g vs 226g).
Oppo K10 5G (China)
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 205g vs 226g
- Better portability (48/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 67W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Oppo K10 5G (China) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 36 points higher (87/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo K10 5G (China) (84/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo K10 5G (China) (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo K10 5G (China) (81/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo K10 5G (China) is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Oppo K10 5G (China) | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 Max | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 67W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 480 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×75.8×8.7 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 226 g | |
| Price | — | $899 |
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Oppo K10 5G (China)
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo K10 5G (China) (84/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo K10 5G (China) (96/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo K10 5G (China) (81/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo K10 5G (China) is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Oppo K10 5G (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo K10 5G (China) by 36 points (87/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo K10 5G (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Oppo K10 5G (China) has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo K10 5G (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Oppo K10 5G (China) over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Oppo K10 5G (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.