OPPO Find X9s vs Xiaomi 15S Pro
The OPPO Find X9s (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Xiaomi 15S Pro (2025) runs on the Xiaomi XRING O1; launch prices were $699 and $760. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 15S Pro leads — 84/100 vs 80/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Find X9s has the bigger battery (7025 mAh vs 6100); the Xiaomi 15S Pro is faster in AnTuTu (2,998,904 vs 2,884,942).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Find X9s
Xiaomi 15S Pro
What makes OPPO Find X9s better?
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 8431
- Bigger battery: 7025 vs 6100 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $699 vs $760
- Overall rating 80/100
What makes Xiaomi 15S Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2998904 vs 2884942
- Better Geekbench Single: 2746 vs 2725
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Find X9s vs the Xiaomi 15S Pro, the Xiaomi 15S Pro scores 4 points higher (84/100 vs 80/100). Value score: OPPO Find X9s — 74/100, Xiaomi 15S Pro — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100. In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 78/100. In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro is a bit better (77/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Find X9s | Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Xiaomi XRING O1 | |
| AnTuTu | 2884942 | 2998904 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 2746 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 8431 | |
| Display | 6.6" LTPS AMOLED | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1256x2760 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7025 mAh | 6100 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP66 | — | |
| Dimensions | 156.9×73.9×7.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 207 g | — | |
| Launch price | $699 | $760 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Find X9s
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 15S Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Find X9s
- 6.6" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1256x2760
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 15S Pro
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Find X9s
- 7025 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 15S Pro
- 6100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Find X9s and Xiaomi 15S Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 15S Pro leads OPPO Find X9s by 3.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $61. OPPO Find X9s was $61 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 78/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro is a bit better (77/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Find X9s or the Xiaomi 15S Pro?
The Xiaomi 15S Pro edges out the OPPO Find X9s by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Find X9s and the Xiaomi 15S Pro?
The OPPO Find X9s has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Xiaomi 15S Pro — 84/100.
Should you choose the OPPO Find X9s over the Xiaomi 15S Pro?
The OPPO Find X9s is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 15S Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.