OPPO Find X9 Pro vs OPPO Reno 16 F
The OPPO Find X9 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the OPPO Reno 16 F (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy; launch prices were $1199 and $480. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 63/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 F has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6200); the OPPO Find X9 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,254,273 vs 877,641); the OPPO Reno 16 F is noticeably lighter (194g vs 217g).
OPPO Find X9 Pro
OPPO Reno 16 F
- Higher AnTuTu: 3254273 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 2900 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10800 vs 2813
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6200 mAh
- Lighter: 194g vs 217g
- Cheaper at launch: $480 vs $1199
- Better portability (58/100 vs 46/100)
Comparing the OPPO Find X9 Pro vs the OPPO Reno 16 F, the OPPO Find X9 Pro scores 24 points higher (87/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (93/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro leads (83/100 vs 68/100). Value score: OPPO Find X9 Pro — 84/100, OPPO Reno 16 F — 54/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 F are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (93/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (83/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 F is a bit better (58/100 vs 46/100).
| Specification | OPPO Find X9 Pro | OPPO Reno 16 F | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | |
| AnTuTu | 3254273 | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2900 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10800 | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2780x1264 | 1080x2372 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6200 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 166 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / ColorOS 15.2 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 1400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68/IP69K | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.5×8.3 mm | 158.2×74.5×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 217 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | $1199 | $480 |
OPPO Find X9 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
OPPO Reno 16 F
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
OPPO Find X9 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2780x1264
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 F
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Find X9 Pro
- 6200 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 19:04 hrs, total 35:19 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
OPPO Reno 16 F
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared OPPO Find X9 Pro and OPPO Reno 16 F, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Find X9 Pro leads OPPO Reno 16 F by 270.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $719. OPPO Reno 16 F was $719 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (93/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 F are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (93/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X9 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F (83/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 F is a bit better (58/100 vs 46/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the OPPO Reno 16 F?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro significantly outperforms the OPPO Reno 16 F by 24 points (87/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Find X9 Pro and the OPPO Reno 16 F?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the OPPO Reno 16 F — 63/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the OPPO Reno 16 F?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro leads on camera score (93/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Find X9 Pro or the OPPO Reno 16 F?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Find X9 Pro over the OPPO Reno 16 F?
The OPPO Find X9 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The OPPO Reno 16 F is a better fit for everyday use.