OPPO Find X8 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

The OPPO Find X8 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Find X8 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 71/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Find X8 Pro has the bigger battery (5910 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 2,938,544); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably lighter (199g vs 215g).

The OPPO Find X8 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Find X8 Pro
Performance 90
Display 84
Camera 86
Battery 78
Portability 48
Value for money 76
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Performance 92
Display 81
Camera 50
Battery 45
Portability 76
Value for money
What makes OPPO Find X8 Pro better?
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9983 vs 9494
  • Bigger battery: 5910 vs 4800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 45W

  • Better camera (86/100 vs 50/100)
  • Longer battery life (78/100 vs 45/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 2938544
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2711
  • Lighter: 199g vs 215g

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 90/100)
  • Better portability (76/100 vs 48/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Find X8 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the OPPO Find X8 Pro scores 12 points higher (83/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X8 Pro leads (86/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X8 Pro leads (78/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the OPPO Find X8 Pro are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X8 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X8 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (86/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X8 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (78/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the OPPO Find X8 Pro (76/100 vs 48/100).

OPPO Find X8 Pro: The OPPO Find X8 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification OPPO Find X8 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2938544 3119308
Geekbench Single 2711 3041
Geekbench Multi 9983 9494
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
Resolution 2780x1264 1828x2584
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5910 mAh 4800 mAh
Charging 80W 45W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 157
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 / ColorOS 15 Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP48
Dimensions 162.3×76.7×8.2 mm 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm
Weight 215 g 199 g
Launch price $1169
Camera comparison
OPPO Find X8 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
86
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 10MP
50
camera
Display comparison
OPPO Find X8 Pro
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2780x1264
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
  • Resolution: 1828x2584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
OPPO Find X8 Pro
  • 5910 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:16 hrs, total 28:59 hrs
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
78
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
45
battery
Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Find X8 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Find X8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9400
83/100
2938544 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100 +5.8%
3119308 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads OPPO Find X8 Pro by 5.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
OPPO Find X8 Pro
$1169
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the OPPO Find X8 Pro are nearly equal (92/100 vs 90/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Find X8 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Find X8 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (86/100 vs 50/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Find X8 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (78/100 vs 45/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the OPPO Find X8 Pro (76/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Find X8 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The OPPO Find X8 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

What is the rating of the OPPO Find X8 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The OPPO Find X8 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Find X8 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The OPPO Find X8 Pro leads on camera score (86/100 vs 50/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Find X8 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The OPPO Find X8 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.