Oppo Find X6 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

The Oppo Find X6 Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Find X6 Pro leads — 78/100 vs 74/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Find X6 Pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 1,933,763); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably lighter (201g vs 216g).

The Oppo Find X6 Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Oppo Find X6 Pro

Performance 77
Display 89
Camera 83
Battery 75
Portability 38
Value for money —

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

Performance 98
Display 80
Camera 50
Battery 52
Portability 74
Value for money —

What makes Oppo Find X6 Pro better?

  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W

  • Better camera (83/100 vs 50/100)
  • Longer battery life (75/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 1933763
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5311
  • Lighter: 201g vs 216g

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 77/100)
  • Better portability (74/100 vs 38/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Oppo Find X6 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Oppo Find X6 Pro scores 4 points higher (78/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Find X6 Pro leads (83/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Find X6 Pro leads (75/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Oppo Find X6 Pro (98/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo Find X6 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Find X6 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (83/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Find X6 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (75/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Oppo Find X6 Pro (74/100 vs 38/100).

Oppo Find X6 Pro: The Oppo Find X6 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Oppo Find X6 Pro Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1933763 3950082
Geekbench Single 2004 3639
Geekbench Multi 5311 11047
Display 6.8" LTPO3 AMOLED 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1440x3168 1828x2448
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4800 mAh
Charging 100W 45W
Wireless charging 50W —
DXOMark (camera) 153 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 Android 17 / One UI 9
Brightness (peak) 2500 nits 3000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP48
Dimensions 164.8×76.2×9.1 mm 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm
Weight 216 g 201 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Oppo Find X6 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
83
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 10MP
50
camera

Display comparison

Oppo Find X6 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO3 AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

  • 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1828x2448
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Oppo Find X6 Pro

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
75
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Oppo Find X6 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Oppo Find X6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
78/100
1933763 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
74/100 +51.0%
3950082 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Oppo Find X6 Pro by 51.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Oppo Find X6 Pro (98/100 vs 77/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Oppo Find X6 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Oppo Find X6 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (83/100 vs 50/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Oppo Find X6 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (75/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Oppo Find X6 Pro (74/100 vs 38/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Oppo Find X6 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Oppo Find X6 Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Oppo Find X6 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Oppo Find X6 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.

Which has the better camera: the Oppo Find X6 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Oppo Find X6 Pro leads on camera score (83/100 vs 50/100).

Which is more powerful: the Oppo Find X6 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 77/100).

Should you choose the Oppo Find X6 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Oppo Find X6 Pro is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.