Oppo Find X4 Pro vs ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
The Oppo Find X4 Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1, while the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 68/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,425,446 vs 1,290,942).
Oppo Find X4 Pro
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1425446 vs 1290942
- Better Geekbench Single: 1761 vs 1675
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4688 vs 4453
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (71/100 vs 69/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 63/100)
Comparing the Oppo Find X4 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra scores 5 points higher (73/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra and the Oppo Find X4 Pro are nearly equal (71/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo Find X4 Pro and the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo Find X4 Pro (86/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 56/100.
| Specification | Oppo Find X4 Pro | ZTE Axon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 1290942 | 1425446 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1675 | 1761 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4453 | 4688 | |
| Display | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3216 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.8×73.1×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Oppo Find X4 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Oppo Find X4 Pro
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3216
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Oppo Find X4 Pro
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 30W
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo Find X4 Pro and ZTE Axon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads Oppo Find X4 Pro by 9.4% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra and the Oppo Find X4 Pro are nearly equal (71/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Find X4 Pro and the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo Find X4 Pro (86/100 vs 63/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 56/100.
Which is better: the Oppo Find X4 Pro or the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra edges out the Oppo Find X4 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Find X4 Pro and the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The Oppo Find X4 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Find X4 Pro or the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 63/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Find X4 Pro over the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The Oppo Find X4 Pro is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.