Oppo Find X4 Pro vs Poco F7 Pro
The Oppo Find X4 Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1, while the Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Pro leads — 80/100 vs 68/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4500); the Poco F7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (2,180,606 vs 1,290,942).
Oppo Find X4 Pro
Poco F7 Pro
- Overall rating 68/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 2180606 vs 1290942
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1675
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 4453
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
- Higher performance (87/100 vs 69/100)
- Better camera (67/100 vs 63/100)
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Oppo Find X4 Pro vs the Poco F7 Pro, the Poco F7 Pro scores 12 points higher (80/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Find X4 Pro (87/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 90/100. In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro and the Oppo Find X4 Pro are nearly equal (67/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Find X4 Pro (87/100 vs 56/100).
| Specification | Oppo Find X4 Pro | Poco F7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1290942 | 2180606 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1675 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4453 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3216 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| Telephoto | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | — | 220 g | |
| Launch price | — | $499 |
Oppo Find X4 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Poco F7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Oppo Find X4 Pro
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3216
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Find X4 Pro
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 30W
Poco F7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Oppo Find X4 Pro and Poco F7 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 Pro leads Oppo Find X4 Pro by 40.8% in our overall performance rating.
Oppo Find X4 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Find X4 Pro (87/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 90/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Pro and the Oppo Find X4 Pro are nearly equal (67/100 vs 63/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the Oppo Find X4 Pro (87/100 vs 56/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Find X4 Pro or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro is noticeably better than the Oppo Find X4 Pro — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Oppo Find X4 Pro and the Poco F7 Pro?
The Oppo Find X4 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Poco F7 Pro — 80/100.
Which is more powerful: the Oppo Find X4 Pro or the Poco F7 Pro?
The Poco F7 Pro leads on performance (87/100 vs 69/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Find X4 Pro over the Poco F7 Pro?
The Oppo Find X4 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.