Oppo A97 5G vs Vivo Y53t 5G

The Oppo A97 5G (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 810, while the Vivo Y53t 5G (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 700 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo A97 5G leads — 41/100 vs 35/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 13 MP; the Oppo A97 5G is faster in AnTuTu (569,913 vs 515,647).

The Oppo A97 5G edges out the Vivo Y53t 5G by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Oppo A97 5G

Performance 42
Display 54
Camera 30
Battery 46
Portability —
Value for money —

Vivo Y53t 5G

Performance 40
Display 39
Camera 10
Battery 52
Portability 65
Value for money —

What makes Oppo A97 5G better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 569913 vs 515647
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 1900 vs 1736
  • Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP

  • Higher performance (42/100 vs 40/100)
  • Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
  • Better display (54/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo Y53t 5G better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 690 vs 684

  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Oppo A97 5G vs the Vivo Y53t 5G, the Oppo A97 5G scores 6 points higher (41/100 vs 35/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo A97 5G leads (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the Oppo A97 5G and the Vivo Y53t 5G are nearly equal (42/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo A97 5G notably outperforms the Vivo Y53t 5G (54/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo A97 5G notably outperforms the Vivo Y53t 5G (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Oppo A97 5G Vivo Y53t 5G
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 810 MediaTek Dimensity 700 ()
AnTuTu 569913 515647
Geekbench Single 684 690
Geekbench Multi 1900 1736
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.5" LCD IPS
Resolution 1080x2408 720x1600
Refresh rate 90 Hz —
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 33W —
Main camera 48 MP 13 MP
Front camera 12 MP 5 MP
RAM 12GB —
Storage 256GB 128GB
OS Android 12 Android 13
NFC no no
Dimensions — 75.6×164.1×8.2 mm
Weight — 186 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Oppo A97 5G

  • Main: 48MP
  • Front: 12MP
30
camera

Vivo Y53t 5G

  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera

Display comparison

Oppo A97 5G

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2408
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
54
display

Vivo Y53t 5G

  • 6.5" LCD IPS
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display

Battery and charging

Oppo A97 5G

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Vivo Y53t 5G

  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Oppo A97 5G and Vivo Y53t 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Oppo A97 5G MediaTek Dimensity 810
41/100
569913 AnTuTu
Vivo Y53t 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700 ()
35/100 -10.5%
515647 AnTuTu

Oppo A97 5G leads Vivo Y53t 5G by 10.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Oppo A97 5G and the Vivo Y53t 5G are nearly equal (42/100 vs 40/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Oppo A97 5G notably outperforms the Vivo Y53t 5G (54/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Oppo A97 5G notably outperforms the Vivo Y53t 5G (30/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Oppo A97 5G or the Vivo Y53t 5G?

The Oppo A97 5G edges out the Vivo Y53t 5G by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Oppo A97 5G and the Vivo Y53t 5G?

The Oppo A97 5G has a MobileRank rating of 41/100, the Vivo Y53t 5G — 35/100.

Which has the better camera: the Oppo A97 5G or the Vivo Y53t 5G?

The Oppo A97 5G leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).

Should you choose the Oppo A97 5G over the Vivo Y53t 5G?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Oppo A97 5G (30/100 vs 10/100).