Oppo A72 vs Redmi Turbo 5
The Oppo A72 (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, while the Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 67/100 vs 36/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Redmi Turbo 5 is faster in AnTuTu (2,809,170 vs 329,457).
Oppo A72
Redmi Turbo 5
- Lighter: 192g vs 204g
- Overall rating 36/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 2809170 vs 329457
- Better Geekbench Single: 1553 vs 321
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6403 vs 1128
- Bigger battery: 7560 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (80/100 vs 24/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the Oppo A72 vs the Redmi Turbo 5, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 31 points higher (67/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (80/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (74/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Oppo A72 (80/100 vs 24/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Oppo A72 (85/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Oppo A72 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Oppo A72 (74/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Oppo A72 | Redmi Turbo 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 329457 | 2809170 | |
| Geekbench Single | 321 | 1553 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1128 | 6403 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2756x1268 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7560 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 10.0; ColorOS 7.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 480 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.0×75.5×8.9 mm | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | — | $250 |
Oppo A72
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Oppo A72
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo A72
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo A72 and Redmi Turbo 5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 leads Oppo A72 by 88.3% in our overall performance rating.
Oppo A72
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Oppo A72 (80/100 vs 24/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Oppo A72 (85/100 vs 58/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Oppo A72 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Oppo A72 (74/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Oppo A72 or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Oppo A72 by 31 points (67/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo A72 and the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Oppo A72 has a MobileRank rating of 36/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 — 67/100.
Which is more powerful: the Oppo A72 or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on performance (80/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Oppo A72 over the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Oppo A72 is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.