Oppo A6s Pro vs Redmi K90
The Oppo A6s Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100 Max, while the Redmi K90 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi K90 leads — 68/100 vs 37/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi K90 has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 7000); the Oppo A6s Pro is noticeably lighter (190g vs 206g).
Oppo A6s Pro
Redmi K90
- Lighter: 190g vs 206g
- Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 42/100)
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 7000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (69/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (53/100 vs 38/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 65/100)
- Better value for money (82/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Oppo A6s Pro vs the Redmi K90, the Redmi K90 scores 31 points higher (68/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 leads (69/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 leads (53/100 vs 38/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K90 leads (82/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 significantly outperforms the Oppo A6s Pro (69/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 notably outperforms the Oppo A6s Pro (53/100 vs 38/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 is a bit better (71/100 vs 65/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo A6s Pro notably outperforms the Redmi K90 (62/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K90 notably outperforms the Oppo A6s Pro (82/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Oppo A6s Pro | Redmi K90 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G100 Max | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3088357 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 2510x1156 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×75.0×8.0 mm | 157.5×75.3×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 206 g | |
| Price | — | $401 |
Oppo A6s Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 50MP
Redmi K90
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Oppo A6s Pro
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K90
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2510x1156
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo A6s Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Redmi K90
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Oppo A6s Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Redmi K90 significantly outperforms the Oppo A6s Pro (69/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi K90 notably outperforms the Oppo A6s Pro (53/100 vs 38/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi K90 is a bit better (71/100 vs 65/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Oppo A6s Pro notably outperforms the Redmi K90 (62/100 vs 42/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K90 notably outperforms the Oppo A6s Pro (82/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Oppo A6s Pro or the Redmi K90?
The Redmi K90 significantly outperforms the Oppo A6s Pro by 31 points (68/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo A6s Pro and the Redmi K90?
The Oppo A6s Pro has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Redmi K90 — 68/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo A6s Pro or the Redmi K90?
The Redmi K90 leads on camera score (53/100 vs 38/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oppo A6s Pro or the Redmi K90?
The Redmi K90 leads on performance (69/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Oppo A6s Pro over the Redmi K90?
The Oppo A6s Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi K90 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.