Oppo A5 Pro (China) vs Vivo Y32t
The Oppo A5 Pro (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo A5 Pro (China) leads — 34/100 vs 11/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo A5 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Oppo A5 Pro (China) has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
Oppo A5 Pro (China)
Vivo Y32t
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (2/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (60/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 180g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 75/100)
Comparing the Oppo A5 Pro (China) vs the Vivo Y32t, the Oppo A5 Pro (China) scores 23 points higher (34/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo A5 Pro (China) leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo A5 Pro (China) leads (60/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Oppo A5 Pro (China) and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo A5 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo A5 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo A5 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (60/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Oppo A5 Pro (China) are nearly equal (76/100 vs 75/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Oppo A5 Pro (China) | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.5×74.9×7.6 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Oppo A5 Pro (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Oppo A5 Pro (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Oppo A5 Pro (China)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Oppo A5 Pro (China) and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (2/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo A5 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo A5 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (27/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo A5 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (60/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Oppo A5 Pro (China) are nearly equal (76/100 vs 75/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Oppo A5 Pro (China) or the Vivo Y32t?
The Oppo A5 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 23 points (34/100 vs 11/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo A5 Pro (China) and the Vivo Y32t?
The Oppo A5 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo A5 Pro (China) or the Vivo Y32t?
The Oppo A5 Pro (China) leads on camera score (27/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Oppo A5 Pro (China) over the Vivo Y32t?
The Oppo A5 Pro (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.