Oppo A17k vs Oppo A77 4G (2022)
The Oppo A17k (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio G35, while the Oppo A77 4G (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio G35. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo A77 4G (2022) leads — 30/100 vs 28/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 8 MP vs 50 MP; the Oppo A77 4G (2022) has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo A17k doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo A17k
Oppo A77 4G (2022)
What makes Oppo A17k better?
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Oppo A77 4G (2022) better?
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Lighter: 187g vs 189g
- Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (44/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (67/100 vs 62/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo A17k vs the Oppo A77 4G (2022), the Oppo A77 4G (2022) scores 2 points higher (30/100 vs 28/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo A77 4G (2022) leads (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo A17k leads (66/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 15/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo A77 4G (2022) is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo A77 4G (2022) notably outperforms the Oppo A17k (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo A17k notably outperforms the Oppo A77 4G (2022) (66/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo A77 4G (2022) is a bit better (67/100 vs 62/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo A17k | Oppo A77 4G (2022) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G35 | MediaTek Helio G35 | |
| AnTuTu | 200794 | 200794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 300 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 843 | 843 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 33W | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IPX4 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.6×8.3 mm | 163.8×75.0×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 187 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Oppo A17k
- Main: 8MP f/2.0
- Front: 5MP
Oppo A77 4G (2022)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Oppo A17k
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: —
Oppo A77 4G (2022)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo A17k
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Oppo A77 4G (2022)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo A17k and Oppo A77 4G (2022), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 15/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo A77 4G (2022) is a bit better (44/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo A77 4G (2022) notably outperforms the Oppo A17k (30/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo A17k notably outperforms the Oppo A77 4G (2022) (66/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo A77 4G (2022) is a bit better (67/100 vs 62/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo A17k or the Oppo A77 4G (2022)?
The Oppo A77 4G (2022) edges out the Oppo A17k by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo A17k and the Oppo A77 4G (2022)?
The Oppo A17k has a MobileRank rating of 28/100, the Oppo A77 4G (2022) — 30/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo A17k or the Oppo A77 4G (2022)?
The Oppo A77 4G (2022) leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Oppo A17k over the Oppo A77 4G (2022)?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the Oppo A77 4G (2022) (30/100 vs 10/100).