OnePlus Ace Racing vs Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
The OnePlus Ace Racing (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99 Ultra. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G leads — 39/100 vs 34/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is noticeably lighter (188g vs 205g).
OnePlus Ace Racing
Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
- Overall rating 34/100
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Lighter: 188g vs 205g
- Better camera (46/100 vs 40/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (65/100 vs 43/100)
- Better value for money (96/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the OnePlus Ace Racing vs the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G scores 5 points higher (39/100 vs 34/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G leads (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is a bit better (46/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 48/100. In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace Racing (65/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G significantly outperforms the OnePlus Ace Racing (96/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | OnePlus Ace Racing | Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | MediaTek Helio G99 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | — | 408000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1890 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 67W | 67W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 480 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×75.8×8.7 mm | 161.1×75.0×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 188 g | |
| Price | — | $200 |
OnePlus Ace Racing
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
OnePlus Ace Racing
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OnePlus Ace Racing
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
OnePlus Ace Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is a bit better (46/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 48/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace Racing (65/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G significantly outperforms the OnePlus Ace Racing (96/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the OnePlus Ace Racing or the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G?
The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G edges out the OnePlus Ace Racing by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OnePlus Ace Racing and the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G?
The OnePlus Ace Racing has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G — 39/100.
Which has the better camera: the OnePlus Ace Racing or the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G?
The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G leads on camera score (46/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the OnePlus Ace Racing over the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G?
The OnePlus Ace Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.