OnePlus Ace Racing vs Redmi K20
The OnePlus Ace Racing (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max, while the Redmi K20 (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 730. By overall MobileRank rating, the OnePlus Ace Racing leads — 34/100 vs 18/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the OnePlus Ace Racing has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 48 MP.
OnePlus Ace Racing
Redmi K20
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 67W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Better camera (40/100 vs 36/100)
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 191g vs 205g
- Better design/ergonomics (61/100 vs 43/100)
- Better value for money (93/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the OnePlus Ace Racing vs the Redmi K20, the OnePlus Ace Racing scores 16 points higher (34/100 vs 18/100). In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Ace Racing leads (48/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K20 leads (93/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the OnePlus Ace Racing significantly outperforms the Redmi K20 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the OnePlus Ace Racing and the Redmi K20 are nearly equal (40/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Ace Racing significantly outperforms the Redmi K20 (48/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi K20 notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace Racing (61/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K20 significantly outperforms the OnePlus Ace Racing (93/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | OnePlus Ace Racing | Redmi K20 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 496392 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 724 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1836 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 2340x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 67W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 480 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×75.8×8.7 mm | — | |
| Weight | 205 g | 191 g | |
| Price | — | $250 |
OnePlus Ace Racing
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Redmi K20
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
OnePlus Ace Racing
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi K20
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
OnePlus Ace Racing
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Redmi K20
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
OnePlus Ace Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the OnePlus Ace Racing significantly outperforms the Redmi K20 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OnePlus Ace Racing and the Redmi K20 are nearly equal (40/100 vs 36/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Ace Racing significantly outperforms the Redmi K20 (48/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi K20 notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace Racing (61/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi K20 significantly outperforms the OnePlus Ace Racing (93/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the OnePlus Ace Racing or the Redmi K20?
The OnePlus Ace Racing is noticeably better than the Redmi K20 — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the OnePlus Ace Racing and the Redmi K20?
The OnePlus Ace Racing has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Redmi K20 — 18/100.
Should you choose the OnePlus Ace Racing over the Redmi K20?
The OnePlus Ace Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Redmi K20 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.