OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra vs OPPO Reno 15 Pro

The OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the OPPO Reno 15 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8450; launch prices were $555 and $420. By overall MobileRank rating, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra leads — 74/100 vs 71/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra has the bigger battery (8600 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,429,868 vs 2,057,699); the OPPO Reno 15 Pro is noticeably lighter (191g vs 217g).

The OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra edges out the OPPO Reno 15 Pro by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra

Performance 94
Display 94
Camera 35
Battery 82
Portability 43
Value for money 66

OPPO Reno 15 Pro

Performance 77
Display 84
Camera 53
Battery 78
Portability 68
Value for money 68

What makes OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3429868 vs 2057699
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1612
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6210
  • Bigger battery: 8600 vs 6500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 77/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)

What makes OPPO Reno 15 Pro better?

  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 191g vs 217g
  • Cheaper at launch: $420 vs $555

  • Better camera (53/100 vs 35/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 43/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra vs the OPPO Reno 15 Pro, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra scores 3 points higher (74/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 15 Pro leads (53/100 vs 35/100). Value score: OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra — 66/100, OPPO Reno 15 Pro — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 15 Pro (94/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 15 Pro notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra (53/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 15 Pro are nearly equal (82/100 vs 78/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 15 Pro notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra (68/100 vs 43/100).

OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra: The OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
OPPO Reno 15 Pro: The OPPO Reno 15 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.

Specs comparison

Specification OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra OPPO Reno 15 Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500 MediaTek Dimensity 8450
AnTuTu 3429868 2057699
Geekbench Single 3293 1612
Geekbench Multi 10243 6210
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1272x2772 2780x1264
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 8600 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 120W 80W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 1800 nits —
NFC yes —
Protection IP66 —
Dimensions 162.5×77.5×8.5 mm —
Weight 217 g 191 g
Launch price $555 $420

Camera comparison

OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

OPPO Reno 15 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.65
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
53
camera

Display comparison

OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1272x2772
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display

OPPO Reno 15 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2780x1264
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra

  • 8600 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
82
battery

OPPO Reno 15 Pro

  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless charging: no data
78
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra and OPPO Reno 15 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9500
74/100
3429868 AnTuTu
OPPO Reno 15 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8450
71/100 -66.7%
2057699 AnTuTu

OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra leads OPPO Reno 15 Pro by 66.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra

$555

OPPO Reno 15 Pro

$420

Launch price difference: $135. OPPO Reno 15 Pro was $135 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno 15 Pro (94/100 vs 77/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 15 Pro notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra (53/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 15 Pro are nearly equal (82/100 vs 78/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 15 Pro notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra (68/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra or the OPPO Reno 15 Pro?

The OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra edges out the OPPO Reno 15 Pro by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra and the OPPO Reno 15 Pro?

The OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the OPPO Reno 15 Pro — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra or the OPPO Reno 15 Pro?

The OPPO Reno 15 Pro leads on camera score (53/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra or the OPPO Reno 15 Pro?

The OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra leads on performance (94/100 vs 77/100).

Should you choose the OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra over the OPPO Reno 15 Pro?

The OnePlus Ace 6 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The OPPO Reno 15 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.