OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

The OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (2026) runs on the Exynos 2600; estimated prices are $350 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra leads — 60/100 vs 57/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 4300); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,830 vs 2,948,304); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is noticeably lighter (180g vs 206g).

The OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra
Performance 62
Display 100
Camera 31
Battery 68
Design 42
Value for money 86
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
Performance 77
Display 100
Camera 30
Battery 23
Design 75
Value for money 34
What makes OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra better?
  • Bigger battery: 6700 vs 4300 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper: $350 vs $1099

  • Better camera (31/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 23/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3161830 vs 2948304
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3271 vs 2729
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11051 vs 8430
  • Lighter: 180g vs 206g

  • Higher performance (77/100 vs 62/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (75/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8, the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra scores 3 points higher (60/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads (77/100 vs 62/100). In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra leads (68/100 vs 23/100). In the "value for money" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra (77/100 vs 62/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 are nearly equal (31/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (68/100 vs 23/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra (75/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (86/100 vs 34/100).

OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra: The OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ Exynos 2600
AnTuTu 2948304 3161830
Geekbench Single 2729 3271
Geekbench Multi 8430 11051
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1272x2800 1080x2520
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6700 mAh 4300 mAh
Charging 100W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 12 MP
Front camera 16 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15, ColorOS 15 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 1400 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65 IP48
Dimensions 163.4×77.0×8.1 mm
Weight 206 g 180 g
Price $350 $1099
Camera comparison
OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
31
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
30
camera
Display comparison
OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1272x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
  • 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1080x2520
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra
  • 6700 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
68
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
  • 4300 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
23
battery
Overall performance score

We compared OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
60/100
2948304 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 Exynos 2600
57/100 +6.8%
3161830 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra by 6.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra
$350
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
$1099

Price difference: $749. OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra is cheaper by $749.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra (77/100 vs 62/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 are nearly equal (31/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (68/100 vs 23/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra (75/100 vs 42/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (86/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 — 57/100.

Which is more powerful: the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads on performance (77/100 vs 62/100).

Should you choose the OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?

The OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for active users.