OnePlus Ace 5 Racing vs Vivo iQOO 16

The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400e, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $250 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 66/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 7100); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 2,536,961); the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing is noticeably lighter (200g vs 223g).

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing by 23 points (89/100 vs 66/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

OnePlus Ace 5 Racing

Performance 84
Display 79
Camera 32
Battery 68
Portability 57
Value for money 82

Vivo iQOO 16

Performance 100
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 90
Portability 42
Value for money 92

What makes OnePlus Ace 5 Racing better?

  • Lighter: 200g vs 223g
  • Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $840

  • Better portability (57/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 2536961
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 2233
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 7478
  • Bigger battery: 8400 vs 7100 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 32/100)
  • Longer battery life (90/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 23 points higher (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 68/100). Value score: OnePlus Ace 5 Racing — 82/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing (100/100 vs 84/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing (78/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (57/100 vs 42/100).

OnePlus Ace 5 Racing: The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo iQOO 16: The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification OnePlus Ace 5 Racing Vivo iQOO 16
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9400e Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
AnTuTu 2536961 5498720
Geekbench Single 2233 4327
Geekbench Multi 7478 12873
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2392 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 7100 mAh 8400 mAh
Charging 80W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, ColorOS 15 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 163.6×76.0×8.2 mm 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm
Weight 200 g 223 g
Launch price $250 $840

Camera comparison

OnePlus Ace 5 Racing

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 16MP
32
camera

Vivo iQOO 16

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

OnePlus Ace 5 Racing

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2392
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

OnePlus Ace 5 Racing

  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
68
battery

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 8400 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
90
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OnePlus Ace 5 Racing and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OnePlus Ace 5 Racing MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
66/100
2536961 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
89/100 +53.9%
5498720 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 16 leads OnePlus Ace 5 Racing by 53.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OnePlus Ace 5 Racing

$250

Vivo iQOO 16

$840

Launch price difference: $590. OnePlus Ace 5 Racing was $590 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing (100/100 vs 84/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing (99/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing (78/100 vs 32/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing (90/100 vs 68/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (57/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing by 23 points (89/100 vs 66/100).

What is the rating of the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing and the Vivo iQOO 16?

The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 32/100).

Which is more powerful: the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 84/100).

Should you choose the OnePlus Ace 5 Racing over the Vivo iQOO 16?

The OnePlus Ace 5 Racing is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.