OnePlus Ace 5 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The OnePlus Ace 5 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $465 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 70/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 6100); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 3,105,769); the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro is noticeably lighter (203g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is noticeably better than the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

OnePlus Ace 5 Pro

Performance 91
Display 84
Camera 35
Battery 68
Portability 56
Value for money 64

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes OnePlus Ace 5 Pro better?

  • Lighter: 203g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $465 vs $799

  • Better portability (56/100 vs 35/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 3105769
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 6100 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 84/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 19 points higher (89/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 68/100). Value score: OnePlus Ace 5 Pro — 64/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro (99/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro (78/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro (92/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (56/100 vs 35/100).

OnePlus Ace 5 Pro: The OnePlus Ace 5 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification OnePlus Ace 5 Pro Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3105769 4602290
Geekbench Single 3013 3639
Geekbench Multi 9287 11047
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1264x2780 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 6100 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 100W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, ColorOS 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65 IP68
Dimensions 161.7×75.8×8.1 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 203 g 227 g
Launch price $465 $799

Camera comparison

OnePlus Ace 5 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

OnePlus Ace 5 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1264x2780
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

OnePlus Ace 5 Pro

  • 6100 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
68
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OnePlus Ace 5 Pro and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OnePlus Ace 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
70/100
3105769 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +32.5%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads OnePlus Ace 5 Pro by 32.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OnePlus Ace 5 Pro

$465

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Launch price difference: $334. OnePlus Ace 5 Pro was $334 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro (99/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro (78/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro (92/100 vs 68/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (56/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is noticeably better than the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The OnePlus Ace 5 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 91/100).

Should you choose the OnePlus Ace 5 Pro over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The OnePlus Ace 5 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.