OnePlus 9 vs ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
The OnePlus 9 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, while the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G leads — 61/100 vs 60/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the OnePlus 9 has the bigger battery (4500 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 48 MP vs 64 MP; the OnePlus 9 is faster in AnTuTu (1,135,878 vs 1,119,714).
OnePlus 9
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- Higher AnTuTu: 1135878 vs 1119714
- Bigger battery: 4500 vs 4200 mAh
- Higher performance (64/100 vs 63/100)
- Longer battery life (50/100 vs 30/100)
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 183g vs 192g
- Better camera (63/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (70/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the OnePlus 9 vs the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G scores 1 points higher (61/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G leads (63/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the OnePlus 9 leads (50/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the OnePlus 9 and the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the OnePlus 9 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G (50/100 vs 30/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a bit better (70/100 vs 56/100).
| Specification | OnePlus 9 | ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | |
| AnTuTu | 1135878 | 1119714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1488 | 1488 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3373 | 3373 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.7" Amoled | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 4200 mAh | |
| Charging | 65W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | — | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1100 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 160.0×74.2×8.7 mm | 163.6×75.3×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 183 g | |
| Price | $729 | — |
OnePlus 9
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Front: —
OnePlus 9
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- 6.7" Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
OnePlus 9
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- Wireless: 15W
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
- 4200 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared OnePlus 9 and ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OnePlus 9 leads ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G by 1.4% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the OnePlus 9 and the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OnePlus 9 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G (50/100 vs 30/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a bit better (70/100 vs 56/100).
Which is better: the OnePlus 9 or the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G edges out the OnePlus 9 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OnePlus 9 and the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The OnePlus 9 has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G — 61/100.
Which has the better camera: the OnePlus 9 or the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G leads on camera score (63/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the OnePlus 9 over the ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G?
The OnePlus 9 is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 31 Pro 5G is a better fit for active users.