OnePlus 7 Pro vs Oppo Reno 5G

The OnePlus 7 Pro (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, while the Oppo Reno 5G (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855. Both devices score the same overall rating of 48/100. Key differences: the Oppo Reno 5G has the bigger battery (4065 mAh vs 4000).

Both devices scored the same rating of 48/100 — the choice comes down to your priorities.

Profile comparison

Category scores

OnePlus 7 Pro

Performance 54
Display 77
Camera 41
Battery 24
Portability 47
Value for money —

Oppo Reno 5G

Performance 54
Display 80
Camera 40
Battery 24
Portability 36
Value for money —

What makes OnePlus 7 Pro better?

  • Faster charging: 30W vs 20W
  • Lighter: 206g vs 215g

  • Better camera (41/100 vs 40/100)
  • Better portability (47/100 vs 36/100)

What makes Oppo Reno 5G better?

  • Bigger battery: 4065 vs 4000 mAh

  • Better display (80/100 vs 77/100)

Comparison verdict

The OnePlus 7 Pro and the Oppo Reno 5G received the same MobileRank rating — 48/100. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno 5G and the OnePlus 7 Pro are nearly equal (80/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the OnePlus 7 Pro and the Oppo Reno 5G are nearly equal (41/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100. In the "portability" category, the OnePlus 7 Pro is a bit better (47/100 vs 36/100).

Specs comparison

Specification OnePlus 7 Pro Oppo Reno 5G
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
AnTuTu 824513 824513
Geekbench Single 968 968
Geekbench Multi 2731 2731
Display 6.7" Fluid AMOLED 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3120 1080x2340
Refresh rate 90 Hz —
Battery 4000 mAh 4065 mAh
Charging 30W 20W
Main camera 48 MP 48 MP
Ultrawide 16 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 8 MP 13 MP
Front camera 16 MP 16 MP
RAM 6GB / 12GB 8GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB
OS Android 9.0 (Pie); OxygenOS 9 Android 9.0 (Pie); ColorOS 6
NFC yes yes
Dimensions 162.6×75.9×8.8 mm 162.0×77.2×9.3 mm
Weight 206 g 215 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

OnePlus 7 Pro

  • Main: 48MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 16MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
41
camera

Oppo Reno 5G

  • Main: 48MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 13MP
  • Front: 16MP
40
camera

Display comparison

OnePlus 7 Pro

  • 6.7" Fluid AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3120
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
77
display

Oppo Reno 5G

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: —
80
display

Battery and charging

OnePlus 7 Pro

  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 30W
  • No wireless charging
24
battery

Oppo Reno 5G

  • 4065 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • No wireless charging
24
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OnePlus 7 Pro and Oppo Reno 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
48/100
824513 AnTuTu
Oppo Reno 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
48/100
824513 AnTuTu

Equal performance based on benchmark results.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 54/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno 5G and the OnePlus 7 Pro are nearly equal (80/100 vs 77/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OnePlus 7 Pro and the Oppo Reno 5G are nearly equal (41/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100.

portability

In the "portability" category, the OnePlus 7 Pro is a bit better (47/100 vs 36/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OnePlus 7 Pro or the Oppo Reno 5G?

Both devices scored 48/100. They are identical on performance — 54/100 for both. The clearest difference is portability: better on the OnePlus 7 Pro (47/100 vs 36/100).

What is the rating of the OnePlus 7 Pro and the Oppo Reno 5G?

The OnePlus 7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Oppo Reno 5G — 48/100.

Should you choose the OnePlus 7 Pro over the Oppo Reno 5G?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the OnePlus 7 Pro (47/100 vs 36/100).