Nubia Z80 Ultra vs ZTE Axon 40 SE
The Nubia Z80 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Axon 40 SE (2022) runs on the Unisoc UMS512T T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nubia Z80 Ultra leads — 85/100 vs 46/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Nubia Z80 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4500); the ZTE Axon 40 SE is noticeably lighter (182g vs 225g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nubia Z80 Ultra
ZTE Axon 40 SE
What makes Nubia Z80 Ultra better?
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 5W
- Better camera (79/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 33/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 81/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 SE better?
- Lighter: 182g vs 225g
- Better portability (74/100 vs 38/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nubia Z80 Ultra vs the ZTE Axon 40 SE, the Nubia Z80 Ultra scores 39 points higher (85/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Nubia Z80 Ultra leads (79/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Nubia Z80 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 33/100). In the "display" category, the Nubia Z80 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 40 SE are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Nubia Z80 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (79/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Nubia Z80 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (81/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE significantly outperforms the Nubia Z80 Ultra (74/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nubia Z80 Ultra | ZTE Axon 40 SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Unisoc UMS512T T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2688x1216 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 5W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 64 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.5×77.2×8.6 mm | 163.5×75.8×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 225 g | 182 g | |
| Launch price | $749 | — |
Camera comparison
Nubia Z80 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.59
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Nubia Z80 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2688x1216
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Nubia Z80 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:17 hrs, total 34:15 hrs
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 80W
ZTE Axon 40 SE
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 40 SE
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Nubia Z80 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 40 SE are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nubia Z80 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (79/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nubia Z80 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE (81/100 vs 33/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 SE significantly outperforms the Nubia Z80 Ultra (74/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nubia Z80 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Nubia Z80 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 SE by 39 points (85/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Nubia Z80 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Nubia Z80 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 85/100, the ZTE Axon 40 SE — 46/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia Z80 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Nubia Z80 Ultra leads on camera score (79/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Z80 Ultra over the ZTE Axon 40 SE?
The Nubia Z80 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.