Nubia Z50S Pro vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Nubia Z50S Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 61/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 5100); the Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 228g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nubia Z50S Pro
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Nubia Z50S Pro better?
- Overall rating 61/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 207g vs 228g
- Better camera (78/100 vs 55/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nubia Z50S Pro vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 23 points higher (84/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Nubia Z50S Pro (99/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Nubia Z50S Pro (78/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Nubia Z50S Pro (73/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Nubia Z50S Pro (55/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nubia Z50S Pro | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, MyOS 13 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.9×76.3×8.3 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 228 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | — | $650 |
Camera comparison
Nubia Z50S Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Nubia Z50S Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Nubia Z50S Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nubia Z50S Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Nubia Z50S Pro (99/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Nubia Z50S Pro (78/100 vs 55/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Nubia Z50S Pro (73/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Nubia Z50S Pro (55/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nubia Z50S Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Nubia Z50S Pro by 23 points (84/100 vs 61/100).
What is the rating of the Nubia Z50S Pro and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Nubia Z50S Pro has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia Z50S Pro or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Z50S Pro over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.