Nubia Z50 Ultra vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
The Nubia Z50 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nubia Z50 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 71/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Nubia Z50 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,842,269 vs 1,290,942); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is noticeably lighter (204g vs 228g).
Nubia Z50 Ultra
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 1842269 vs 1290942
- Better Geekbench Single: 2004 vs 1675
- Better Geekbench Multi: 5311 vs 4453
- Faster charging: 80W vs 65W
- Higher performance (76/100 vs 69/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 52/100)
- Lighter: 204g vs 228g
- Better portability (52/100 vs 40/100)
Comparing the Nubia Z50 Ultra vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, the Nubia Z50 Ultra scores 2 points higher (73/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Nubia Z50 Ultra is a bit better (76/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 86/100. In the "battery" category, the Nubia Z50 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).
| Specification | Nubia Z50 Ultra | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 1842269 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2004 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5311 | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1116x2480 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, MyOS 13 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1500 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 163.9×76.3×8.3 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 228 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Nubia Z50 Ultra
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Nubia Z50 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nubia Z50 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nubia Z50 Ultra and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nubia Z50 Ultra leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra by 42.7% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nubia Z50 Ultra is a bit better (76/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 86/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nubia Z50 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Z50 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The Nubia Z50 Ultra edges out the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nubia Z50 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The Nubia Z50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra — 71/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Z50 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The Nubia Z50 Ultra leads on performance (76/100 vs 69/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Z50 Ultra over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The Nubia Z50 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.