Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) vs Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo

The Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Both devices score the same overall rating of 72/100. Key differences: the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 7600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 2,955,676); the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is noticeably lighter (202g vs 230g).

Both devices scored the same rating of 72/100 — the choice comes down to your priorities.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China)
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 47
Battery 69
Design 12
Value for money 55
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
Performance 78
Display 100
Camera 52
Battery 72
Design 47
Value for money 78
What makes Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 2955676
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 7600 mAh

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 78/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo better?
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 202g vs 230g

  • Better camera (52/100 vs 47/100)
  • Longer battery life (72/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (47/100 vs 12/100)
  • Better value for money (78/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

The Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) and the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo received the same MobileRank rating — 72/100. In the "performance" category, the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) leads (92/100 vs 78/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo leads (78/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) is a bit better (92/100 vs 78/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is a bit better (52/100 vs 47/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo and the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) are nearly equal (72/100 vs 69/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo significantly outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) (47/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo notably outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) (78/100 vs 55/100).

Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China): The Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo: The Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3942923 2955676
Geekbench Single 3640 3640
Geekbench Multi 11033 11033
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 1216x2688 1260x2750
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 8000 mAh 7600 mAh
Charging 80W 100W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16, Redmagic OS 11 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2000 nits 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 IP68
Dimensions 163.8×76.5×8.9 mm 157.6×74.4×7.9 mm
Weight 230 g 202 g
Price $460
Camera comparison
Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
47
camera
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
52
camera
Display comparison
Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China)
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2688
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2750
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China)
  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
69
battery
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
  • 7600 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
72
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) and Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
72/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
72/100 -33.4%
2955676 AnTuTu

Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) leads Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo by 33.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China)
Price unknown
Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo
$460
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) is a bit better (92/100 vs 78/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is a bit better (52/100 vs 47/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo and the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) are nearly equal (72/100 vs 69/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo significantly outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) (47/100 vs 12/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo notably outperforms the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) (78/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) or the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo?

Both devices scored 72/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China).

What is the rating of the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) and the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo?

The Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo — 72/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) or the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo?

The Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo leads on camera score (52/100 vs 47/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) or the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo?

The Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) leads on performance (92/100 vs 78/100).

Should you choose the Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) over the Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo?

The Nubia Red Magic 11 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO Z11 Turbo is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.