Nubia Red Magic 10 Air vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Nubia Red Magic 10 Air (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $589 and $2899. Both devices score the same overall rating of 69/100. Key differences: the Nubia Red Magic 10 Air has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 2,408,665); the Nubia Red Magic 10 Air is noticeably lighter (205g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nubia Red Magic 10 Air
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Nubia Red Magic 10 Air better?
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Lighter: 205g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $589 vs $2899
- Better display (80/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (57/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 2408665
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6511
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
The Nubia Red Magic 10 Air and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold received the same MobileRank rating — 69/100. Value score: Nubia Red Magic 10 Air — 54/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Nubia Red Magic 10 Air is a bit better (80/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100. In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 63/100. In the "portability" category, the Nubia Red Magic 10 Air significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (57/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nubia Red Magic 10 Air | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2408665 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2203 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6511 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1116x2480 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1600 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×76.6×7.9 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $589 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Nubia Red Magic 10 Air
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Nubia Red Magic 10 Air
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Nubia Red Magic 10 Air
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Nubia Red Magic 10 Air and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Nubia Red Magic 10 Air by 17.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2310. Nubia Red Magic 10 Air was $2310 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (90/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nubia Red Magic 10 Air is a bit better (80/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 63/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nubia Red Magic 10 Air significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (57/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nubia Red Magic 10 Air or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
Both devices scored 69/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 82/100).
What is the rating of the Nubia Red Magic 10 Air and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nubia Red Magic 10 Air has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Red Magic 10 Air or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Red Magic 10 Air over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nubia Red Magic 10 Air is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.