Nubia Neo 5 GT vs ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
The Nubia Neo 5 GT (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400, while the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 57/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Nubia Neo 5 GT has the bigger battery (6210 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,425,446 vs 956,756).
Nubia Neo 5 GT
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- Bigger battery: 6210 vs 5000 mAh
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 56/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1425446 vs 956756
- Better Geekbench Single: 1761 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4688 vs 3185
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (71/100 vs 57/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 35/100)
Comparing the Nubia Neo 5 GT vs the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra scores 16 points higher (73/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads (71/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a bit better (71/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 GT (86/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Nubia Neo 5 GT is a bit better (64/100 vs 56/100).
| Specification | Nubia Neo 5 GT | ZTE Axon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 956756 | 1425446 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 1761 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3185 | 4688 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6210 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.8×73.1×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $465 | — |
Nubia Neo 5 GT
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nubia Neo 5 GT
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nubia Neo 5 GT
- 6210 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nubia Neo 5 GT and ZTE Axon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads Nubia Neo 5 GT by 32.9% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a bit better (71/100 vs 57/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nubia Neo 5 GT (86/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nubia Neo 5 GT is a bit better (64/100 vs 56/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Neo 5 GT or the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is noticeably better than the Nubia Neo 5 GT — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Nubia Neo 5 GT and the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The Nubia Neo 5 GT has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia Neo 5 GT or the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Neo 5 GT or the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra leads on performance (71/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Neo 5 GT over the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The Nubia Neo 5 GT is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.