Nubia Music vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Nubia Music (2024) runs on the Unisoc, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 38/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Nubia Music is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Nubia Music
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 20/100)
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (52/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Nubia Music vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 31 points higher (69/100 vs 38/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nubia Music (70/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nubia Music (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nubia Music (63/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Nubia Music significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (53/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Nubia Music | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×74.9×8.6 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Nubia Music
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Nubia Music
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nubia Music
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Nubia Music
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nubia Music (70/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nubia Music (52/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nubia Music (63/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nubia Music significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (53/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Music or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nubia Music by 31 points (69/100 vs 38/100).
What is the rating of the Nubia Music and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nubia Music has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia Music or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Music over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nubia Music is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.