Nubia Focus Pro vs ZTE Axon 40
The Nubia Focus Pro (2024) runs on the Unisoc T760, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 58/100 vs 49/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 108 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 628,581); the ZTE Axon 40 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 222g).
Nubia Focus Pro
ZTE Axon 40
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Overall rating 49/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 628581
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 2186
- Lighter: 200g vs 222g
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (51/100 vs 48/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (73/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (53/100 vs 40/100)
Comparing the Nubia Focus Pro vs the ZTE Axon 40, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 9 points higher (58/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nubia Focus Pro (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (73/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 and the Nubia Focus Pro are nearly equal (51/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (53/100 vs 40/100).
| Specification | Nubia Focus Pro | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T760 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 628581 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2186 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | — | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.0×76.1×8.5 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 222 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Nubia Focus Pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Nubia Focus Pro
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nubia Focus Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Nubia Focus Pro and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 leads Nubia Focus Pro by 37.8% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nubia Focus Pro (61/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (73/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 and the Nubia Focus Pro are nearly equal (51/100 vs 48/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (53/100 vs 40/100).
Which is better: the Nubia Focus Pro or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 edges out the Nubia Focus Pro by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nubia Focus Pro and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Nubia Focus Pro has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Focus Pro or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on performance (61/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Focus Pro over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Nubia Focus Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.