Nubia Focus 2 vs ZTE Axon 40
The Nubia Focus 2 (2025) runs on the Unisoc T760, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 58/100 vs 46/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 108 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 628,581).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nubia Focus 2
ZTE Axon 40
What makes Nubia Focus 2 better?
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 64MP
- Better portability (60/100 vs 53/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 628581
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 735
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 2318
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (51/100 vs 41/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (73/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nubia Focus 2 vs the ZTE Axon 40, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 12 points higher (58/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (51/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nubia Focus 2 (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nubia Focus 2 (73/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (51/100 vs 41/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Nubia Focus 2 is a bit better (60/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nubia Focus 2 | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T760 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 628581 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 735 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2318 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 22W | — | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×74.9×8.0 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | — | 200 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Nubia Focus 2
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Display comparison
Nubia Focus 2
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Nubia Focus 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 22W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nubia Focus 2 and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 leads Nubia Focus 2 by 37.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nubia Focus 2 (61/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nubia Focus 2 (73/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (51/100 vs 41/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nubia Focus 2 is a bit better (60/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nubia Focus 2 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 is noticeably better than the Nubia Focus 2 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Nubia Focus 2 and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Nubia Focus 2 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia Focus 2 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (51/100 vs 41/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nubia Focus 2 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on performance (61/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Nubia Focus 2 over the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.