Nubia A77 vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Nubia A77 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T8300, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6; launch prices were $260 and $840. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 43/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 639,225); the Nubia A77 is noticeably lighter (193g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nubia A77
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Nubia A77 better?
- Lighter: 193g vs 223g
- Cheaper at launch: $260 vs $840
- Better portability (60/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 639225
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 880
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 2073
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 22W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nubia A77 vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 46 points higher (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Nubia A77 — 34/100, Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Nubia A77 (100/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Nubia A77 (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Nubia A77 (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Nubia A77 (90/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Nubia A77 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (60/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nubia A77 | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T8300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 639225 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 880 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2073 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 22W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×77.0×8.3 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 193 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | $260 | $840 |
Camera comparison
Nubia A77
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Nubia A77
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Nubia A77
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 22W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Nubia A77 and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Nubia A77 by 88.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $580. Nubia A77 was $580 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Nubia A77 (100/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Nubia A77 (99/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Nubia A77 (78/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Nubia A77 (90/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nubia A77 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (60/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nubia A77 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Nubia A77 by 46 points (89/100 vs 43/100).
What is the rating of the Nubia A77 and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Nubia A77 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nubia A77 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nubia A77 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Nubia A77 over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.