Nothing Phone (4a) vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

The Nothing Phone (4a) (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $349 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 82/100 vs 39/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5200); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,593,401 vs 1,148,725); the Nothing Phone (4a) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 226g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) by 43 points (82/100 vs 39/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nothing Phone (4a)
Performance 9
Display 100
Camera 37
Battery 48
Design 62
Value for money 86
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Performance 87
Display 100
Camera 93
Battery 72
Design 17
Value for money 41
What makes Nothing Phone (4a) better?
  • Lighter: 190g vs 226g
  • Cheaper: $349 vs $999

  • Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 17/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 41/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3593401 vs 1148725
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1237
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3281
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W

  • Higher performance (87/100 vs 9/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (72/100 vs 48/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nothing Phone (4a) vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 43 points higher (82/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (87/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (72/100 vs 48/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) leads (86/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (87/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (93/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (72/100 vs 48/100). In the "design" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (62/100 vs 17/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (86/100 vs 41/100).

Nothing Phone (4a): The Nothing Phone (4a) is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra: The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Nothing Phone (4a) Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1148725 3593401
Geekbench Single 1237 3640
Geekbench Multi 3281 11033
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2412x1080 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 166
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 164.0×77.6×8.6 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 190 g 226 g
Price $349 $999
Camera comparison
Nothing Phone (4a)
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
37
camera
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/1.63
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
93
camera
Display comparison
Nothing Phone (4a)
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2412x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Nothing Phone (4a)
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
72
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nothing Phone (4a) and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
39/100
1148725 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
82/100 +68.0%
3593401 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (4a) by 68.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nothing Phone (4a)
$349
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
$999

Price difference: $650. Nothing Phone (4a) is cheaper by $650.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (87/100 vs 9/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (93/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (72/100 vs 48/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (62/100 vs 17/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (86/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (4a) or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) by 43 points (82/100 vs 39/100).

What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (4a) and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Nothing Phone (4a) has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (4a) or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (4a) or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (87/100 vs 9/100).

Should you choose the Nothing Phone (4a) over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Nothing Phone (4a) is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.