Nothing Phone (4a) vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+

The Nothing Phone (4a) (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; launch prices were $349 and $280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads — 71/100 vs 62/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5200); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is faster in AnTuTu (2,786,169 vs 1,039,119); the Nothing Phone (4a) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 212g).

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ edges out the Nothing Phone (4a) by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Nothing Phone (4a)

Performance 60
Display 80
Camera 61
Battery 53
Portability 59
Value for money 58

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+

Performance 88
Display 94
Camera 35
Battery 73
Portability 50
Value for money 86

What makes Nothing Phone (4a) better?

  • Lighter: 190g vs 212g

  • Better camera (61/100 vs 35/100)
  • Better portability (59/100 vs 50/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2786169 vs 1039119
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2729 vs 1223
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8430 vs 3168
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5200 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $280 vs $349

  • Higher performance (88/100 vs 60/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 53/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nothing Phone (4a) vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ scores 9 points higher (71/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (88/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) leads (61/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (73/100 vs 53/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (4a) — 58/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (88/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (61/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (73/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) is a bit better (59/100 vs 50/100).

Nothing Phone (4a): The Nothing Phone (4a) is a better fit for active users.
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+: The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Nothing Phone (4a) Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
AnTuTu 1039119 2786169
Geekbench Single 1223 2729
Geekbench Multi 3168 8430
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2412x1080 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 8000 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP65
Dimensions 164.0×77.6×8.6 mm 163.7×75.9×8.2 mm
Weight 190 g 212 g
Launch price $349 $280

Camera comparison

Nothing Phone (4a)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
61
camera

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+

  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Display comparison

Nothing Phone (4a)

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2412x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Nothing Phone (4a)

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+

  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Nothing Phone (4a) and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
62/100
1039119 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
71/100 +62.7%
2786169 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads Nothing Phone (4a) by 62.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Nothing Phone (4a)

$349

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+

$280

Launch price difference: $69. Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ was $69 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (88/100 vs 60/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (61/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (73/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) is a bit better (59/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Nothing Phone (4a) or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ edges out the Nothing Phone (4a) by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (4a) and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?

The Nothing Phone (4a) has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (4a) or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?

The Nothing Phone (4a) leads on camera score (61/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (4a) or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?

The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads on performance (88/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Nothing Phone (4a) over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?

The Nothing Phone (4a) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.