Nothing Phone (3a) vs Vivo X200s
The Nothing Phone (3a) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Vivo X200s (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; launch prices were $329 and $600. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200s leads — 82/100 vs 60/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200s has the bigger battery (6200 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X200s is faster in AnTuTu (2,830,117 vs 1,050,601).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nothing Phone (3a)
Vivo X200s
What makes Nothing Phone (3a) better?
- Lighter: 201g vs 203g
- Cheaper at launch: $329 vs $600
- Overall rating 60/100
What makes Vivo X200s better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2830117 vs 1050601
- Better Geekbench Single: 2729 vs 1161
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8430 vs 3390
- Bigger battery: 6200 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (79/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (57/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nothing Phone (3a) vs the Vivo X200s, the Vivo X200s scores 22 points higher (82/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200s leads (89/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200s leads (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200s leads (79/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (3a) — 56/100, Vivo X200s — 78/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200s notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (89/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200s is a bit better (85/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200s notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200s significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (79/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200s and the Nothing Phone (3a) are nearly equal (57/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nothing Phone (3a) | Vivo X200s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | 1050601 | 2830117 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1161 | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3390 | 8430 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2392x1080 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6200 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1 | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm | 160.0×74.3×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 203 g | |
| Launch price | $329 | $600 |
Camera comparison
Nothing Phone (3a)
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X200s
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Nothing Phone (3a)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2392x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200s
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Nothing Phone (3a)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X200s
- 6200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Nothing Phone (3a) and Vivo X200s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200s leads Nothing Phone (3a) by 62.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $271. Nothing Phone (3a) was $271 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200s notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (89/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200s is a bit better (85/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200s notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (78/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200s significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (79/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200s and the Nothing Phone (3a) are nearly equal (57/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (3a) or the Vivo X200s?
The Vivo X200s significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) by 22 points (82/100 vs 60/100).
What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (3a) and the Vivo X200s?
The Nothing Phone (3a) has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo X200s — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (3a) or the Vivo X200s?
The Vivo X200s leads on camera score (78/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (3a) or the Vivo X200s?
The Vivo X200s leads on performance (89/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Nothing Phone (3a) over the Vivo X200s?
The Nothing Phone (3a) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X200s is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.