Nothing Phone (3a) vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The Nothing Phone (3a) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $329 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 79/100 vs 60/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,780,751 vs 1,050,601); the Nothing Phone (3a) is noticeably lighter (201g vs 218g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nothing Phone (3a)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
What makes Nothing Phone (3a) better?
- Lighter: 201g vs 218g
- Cheaper at launch: $329 vs $1299
- Better portability (54/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2780751 vs 1050601
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1161
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 3390
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nothing Phone (3a) vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 19 points higher (79/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 61/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (3a) — 56/100, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (81/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (56/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) is a bit better (54/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nothing Phone (3a) | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1050601 | 2780751 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1161 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3390 | 9760 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2392x1080 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 151 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 218 g | |
| Launch price | $329 | $1299 |
Camera comparison
Nothing Phone (3a)
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Nothing Phone (3a)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2392x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Nothing Phone (3a)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Nothing Phone (3a) and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3a) by 62.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $970. Nothing Phone (3a) was $970 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (91/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (81/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (56/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) is a bit better (54/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (3a) or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (3a) — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (3a) and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Nothing Phone (3a) has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 79/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (3a) or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (3a) or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Nothing Phone (3a) over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Nothing Phone (3a) is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.