Nothing Phone (3a) vs OPPO Reno16 F

The Nothing Phone (3a) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the OPPO Reno16 F (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy; launch prices were $329 and $480. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 F leads — 63/100 vs 60/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 F has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the Nothing Phone (3a) is faster in AnTuTu (1,050,601 vs 879,714).

The OPPO Reno16 F edges out the Nothing Phone (3a) by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Nothing Phone (3a)

Performance 60
Display 79
Camera 61
Battery 48
Portability 54
Value for money 56

OPPO Reno16 F

Performance 55
Display 80
Camera 64
Battery 68
Portability 58
Value for money 48

What makes Nothing Phone (3a) better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1050601 vs 879714
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1161 vs 1011
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 3390 vs 2813
  • Cheaper at launch: $329 vs $480

  • Higher performance (60/100 vs 55/100)

What makes OPPO Reno16 F better?

  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
  • Lighter: 194g vs 201g

  • Better camera (64/100 vs 61/100)
  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 48/100)
  • Better display (80/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better portability (58/100 vs 54/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nothing Phone (3a) vs the OPPO Reno16 F, the OPPO Reno16 F scores 3 points higher (63/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 F leads (68/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (3a) — 56/100, OPPO Reno16 F — 48/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) is a bit better (60/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 F and the Nothing Phone (3a) are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 F and the Nothing Phone (3a) are nearly equal (64/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 F notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (68/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 F and the Nothing Phone (3a) are nearly equal (58/100 vs 54/100).

Nothing Phone (3a): The Nothing Phone (3a) is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Nothing Phone (3a) OPPO Reno16 F
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy
AnTuTu 1050601 879714
Geekbench Single 1161 1011
Geekbench Multi 3390 2813
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 2392x1080 1080x2372
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 45W 80W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 1400 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP68/IP69K
Dimensions 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm 158.2×74.5×8.4 mm
Weight 201 g 194 g
Launch price $329 $480

Camera comparison

Nothing Phone (3a)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
61
camera

OPPO Reno16 F

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
64
camera

Display comparison

Nothing Phone (3a)

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2392x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

OPPO Reno16 F

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2372
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Nothing Phone (3a)

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery

OPPO Reno16 F

  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
68
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Nothing Phone (3a) and OPPO Reno16 F, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
60/100
1050601 AnTuTu
OPPO Reno16 F MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy
63/100 -19.4%
879714 AnTuTu

Nothing Phone (3a) leads OPPO Reno16 F by 19.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Nothing Phone (3a)

$329

OPPO Reno16 F

$480

Launch price difference: $151. Nothing Phone (3a) was $151 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) is a bit better (60/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 F and the Nothing Phone (3a) are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 F and the Nothing Phone (3a) are nearly equal (64/100 vs 61/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 F notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (68/100 vs 48/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 F and the Nothing Phone (3a) are nearly equal (58/100 vs 54/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Nothing Phone (3a) or the OPPO Reno16 F?

The OPPO Reno16 F edges out the Nothing Phone (3a) by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (3a) and the OPPO Reno16 F?

The Nothing Phone (3a) has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the OPPO Reno16 F — 63/100.

Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (3a) or the OPPO Reno16 F?

The Nothing Phone (3a) leads on performance (60/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Nothing Phone (3a) over the OPPO Reno16 F?

The Nothing Phone (3a) is a better fit for active users.