Nothing Phone (3a) Pro vs Tecno Pova 7 Ultra

The Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Dimensity 8350 Ultimate; launch prices were $459 and $300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads — 65/100 vs 61/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,700,848 vs 1,063,102).

The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra edges out the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Performance 60
Display 79
Camera 64
Battery 49
Portability 54
Value for money 52
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
Performance 70
Display 94
Camera 43
Battery 72
Portability 44
Value for money 72
What makes Nothing Phone (3a) Pro better?
  • Lighter: 201g vs 209g

  • Better camera (64/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better portability (54/100 vs 44/100)
What makes Tecno Pova 7 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1700848 vs 1063102
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1398 vs 1162
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4313 vs 3315
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 70W vs 50W
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $459

  • Higher performance (70/100 vs 60/100)
  • Longer battery life (72/100 vs 49/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro vs the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra scores 4 points higher (65/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads (70/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro leads (64/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads (72/100 vs 49/100). Value score: Nothing Phone (3a) Pro — 52/100, Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 72/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (70/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (64/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (72/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 44/100).

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro: The Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is a better fit for active users.
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra: The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
AnTuTu 1063102 1700848
Geekbench Single 1162 1398
Geekbench Multi 3315 4313
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2392x1080 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 50W 70W
Wireless charging 0W 30W
Main camera 50 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 50 MP 13 MP
RAM 12GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB 256GB
OS Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1 Android 15 / HIOS 15
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP64
Dimensions 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm 160.0×75.2×8.9 mm
Weight 201 g 209 g
Launch price $459 $300
Camera comparison
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
64
camera
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
  • Main: 108MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
43
camera
Display comparison
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2392x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 50W
  • No wireless charging
49
battery
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • Wireless: 30W
72
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nothing Phone (3a) Pro and Tecno Pova 7 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nothing Phone (3a) Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
61/100
1063102 AnTuTu
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra Dimensity 8350 Ultimate
65/100 +37.5%
1700848 AnTuTu

Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3a) Pro by 37.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
$459
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
$300

Launch price difference: $159. Tecno Pova 7 Ultra was $159 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (70/100 vs 60/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (94/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (64/100 vs 43/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (72/100 vs 49/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 44/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra edges out the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro and the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Nothing Phone (3a) Pro has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra — 65/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Nothing Phone (3a) Pro leads on camera score (64/100 vs 43/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro or the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads on performance (70/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro over the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra?

The Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is a better fit for active users. The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for active users.